requestId:68499ac31e54e5.65504578.
A Discussion on Mencius’s “It’s Like It’s Like It’s Like It” (II)
Author: Lin Guizhen, Liu Sihe
Source: Author Authorized by the Confucian Network Release
Time: Confucius was in the 2570 year of Jihai Pu’s lunar month and Bingzi
What I think is confused about when I read Mencius is here. The four ends are originally emotions. Why does he not say it clearly? Talking about the four ends of the heart. To put it in reality, I don’t understand the relationship between the three minds and personality. Mencius and Xunxun are both Zhu Zi’s explanation is at most a clear model. I think Meng’s four ends are influenced by the doctrine of the mean. But he seems to prevent the four ends of the words. What is wrong with not understanding it. It’s just my feeling
[Liu Sihe] I think of something tomorrow. Mencius’s popular and popular meaning is the foundation of politics. It is indeed what people say. It is true that people have never said anything. In fact, it is the essence of Chinese traditional politics. It can be called the proof of the political in a mobile way that conforms to the legal nature. However, this requires a modern method of proof of proof.
[Lin Guizhen] Teacher Liu is good. When reading ancient books, you must pronounce the words (don’t swallow them in a hurry and read the meaning of literary meaning). Mencius’s word “it is like his feelings” refers to the “nature” mentioned in the previous text, which means “as for the situation of nature”, and in the following text, “the reality of nature (scenario) can be good”. Zhu Zi and others interpret it as the emotional feelings that are expressed in “nature-emotion” and are completely separated from each other. Liu Zongzhou said: “The ancients read books only because every sentence is clear, so they cannot be kept. If there is something unclear, it is easy to negotiate. However, when you knock it slowly, you can’t understand every word.” (Volume 62 of the Ming Confucian Cases)
[Liu Sihe] What do you say about Zhu Zi? I have different opinions. The problem is not the language, but the type of Mencius’s meaning. I don’t trust Zhu Zi and can’t see this meaning. He is understanding from the perspective of Mencius’s whole body. He has his own principles. He is completely separated from the so-called ” Too much
[Lin Guizhen] Zhu Zi is a thinker. He used their thoughts to cut off Mencius. The big thinkers have this problem. From the perspective of pure academic studies, the difference is “Six Bets on Me”. Therefore, the Confucianism in the Song Dynasty was “new Confucianism” and “Taoism”.
[Lin Guizhen]As for Mencius’s “four ends”, it is actually the type of “knowledge” mentioned by Xunzi, not just “emotion”, nor “desire”, but good knowledge of merit and content. The ethical and mental knowledge (consciousness, perception) of the “four ends (×× mind)” category is the manifestation of “nature”, and “nature” is the manifestation of “heaven”. This is probably Mencius’ basic thoughts or ideas.
【Liu Sihe】Big Yes If you say the little cat is at handoverIt seemed a little dissatisfied and mourned for two sounds. Knowledge is a direct knowledge, but Xunzi’s knowledge should not be direct
[Liu Sihe]博官网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台网平台� The same is true for Xunzi’s sexual desire (not limited to only one lust), as for the direct knowledge and whether it is the concept of ancient people? Mencius’s knowledge of short-term and Xunzi’s knowledge of benevolence and righteousness should be combined.
[Liu Sihe] His shortness is known immediately. The first meaning of the dedicated learning is the first thought. How can it be the same as Xunzi?
[Lin Guizhen]But it must be directly released without thinking and acquired cultivation. That is the result of his good nature and good nature thinking. Mencius’s knowledge of the “four-end mind” is of course the direct revelation or manifestation of “nature”. Mencius’s thoughts and understanding is like this. You are very right, and I agree with it.
【Lin Guizhen】The truth of ethics and short-term knowledge is the same. How can each thinker explain it is the matter of the thinker. One object, one fact, two explanations, two rationale! It’s like you and me know about not stealing the secrets, the same quality!
【Liu Sihe】This is a different meaning. Is there anything that is the same? Is the zodiac sign of the world short?
[Lin Guizhen] Haha, there are two long and short knowledge in the two people. Do you know that the subject is two, but do you know that the length is two?
【Liu Sihe】In Confucianism, not stealing and slandering is second, and slandering is first. Your judgment is not valid
[Lin Guizhen] Knowing that one person has two experiences, one knows the long and short-term reality: don’t steal and stolen money! I am an example of the short-term knowledge, without explaining the problem of ethics.
【It’s a furry little guy, holding it in his arms, his eyes are terrible, and his eyes are closed】In Mencius’ world, there is no public length and shortness. Long shortness is boundless.The problem of tracing the Internet is the most familiar
[Lin Guizhen] The ethical quality that must not be stolen and exposed is just a financial right.
[Liu Sihe] Have you noticed that Mencius proved that benevolence is very easy, and not to say that the wise man is intrinsic, and there can be differences tomorrow
[Lin Guizhen]Do you noticed that the benevolence is very easy, and not to say that the wise man is intrinsic. Mencius is a natural theory of the heavenly being, which is different from Xunzi who has experienced the theory. Mencius has his own set of interpretation systems, which are very high-level and lovely. My understanding is that Mencius has high-level thinking and simple theory. Some people think that the opposite of me is, hehe.
【Liu Sihe】 Yes, Mencius was very simple, straightforward and expensive, and to keep a monthly pricearrogant
[Lin Guizhen] Catch the big book, and understand all kinds of knowledge. People who read books in a popular way, especially those who are ethical (relatively seeking truth-seeking knowledge) like Mencius. First, they intend to use virtue to be arrogant, and the other is to use derivative logic to be self-represented (generate nature, nature is born from the mind, and the mind knows the nature, and achieves the destiny).
[Liu Sihe] It is true that Mencius was the Confucian scholar Huineng
[Lin Guizhen] Liked to speak ethical Confucian scholars, like Zhu Zi, like Mou Zi, both like Mencius; but those who are literate and have theories are Xunzi, like Hu Yang, Fu Sinian, and Chen Yinke, but they don’t like Mencius much (of course they also learn Mencius’s energy and energy).
Baocai Club【Liu Sihe】haha
[Lin Guizhen]Mencius is the Religious Huineng——Gao! (Kang You is expressed). Mencius is the Confucian Huineng, and Huineng is the Buddhist Mencius, and I also read it the same.
[Liu Sihe] Zhuangzi is much more complicated than Mencius. Although the two are more similar to each other’s genres, they are very interesting and fighting each other
[Lin Guizhen] Mengzi was energetic and had a deep energy but had a simple brain; Zhuangzi was knowledgeable and had a good understanding, so his energy was definitely not simple.
【Lin Guizhen】Mencius’s motivation and learning is a holy; Xunzi’s motivation and learning is also a holy. Mencius, the virtue saint, was learned from the saint Xunzi, so the Taoist sect recommended Mencius, and the learning sect recommended Xunzi.
【Liu Sihe】Meng Zhu is all moving inward. Taking the development of the mind as a characteristic and reaching the level of heaven. However, Meng is a unidirectionalist and a pluralist.
[Lin Guizhen]But Meng is a unidirectionalist and a pluralist.—How to understand diversity? Please teach me, Back to message boardI don’t understand 生后, and I don’t read carefully.
[Liu Sihe] Mencius’s book This is its key, and the 生后 is to preserve the difference and the so-called diversity. I borrowed it. Mencius used Yang Mo to eliminate it quickly. Zhuanzi said that ghosts and monsters were slandered. Taoism is one
【Lin Guizhen】Mencius is a ethical theory; sacred things are natural theory. Mencius learns that after being applied by power, the kind of harm that sacred things will appear. The sacred things are very respectable, but also terrifying. With all the sacred ideas, they
發佈留言